West End Stage Shows – The Very Best Entertainment in London



The West End is very well regarded for professional stage shows. Together with New York’s Broadway, Westend entertainment is frequently considered to deliver many of the very best shows in the world. Seeing a West End production is exceptionally popular entertainment especially among visitors. Many stage shows and in particular hit musicals are staged in the great venues of London’s Theatreland. Large numbers of people attend a West End theatre show each year. West End Theatre Breaks are also extremely common in the UK. Theatre Breaks are regularly booked as a short break luxury to celebrate a special occasion. A Westend show is the focal entertainment but booked together with a hotel and often restaurant reservations for a special meal.

The main theatre region of London consists of around forty venues and was renamed by Westminster Council and the Society of London Theatre as ‘Theatreland’. It is located in the heart of the West End of Central London and is traditionally defined by Oxford Street to the North, The Strand to the South, Regent Street to the West and Kingsway to the East. Prominent theatre streets are Drury Lane, Shaftesbury Avenue and The Strand. Most of the works staged are musical theatre, classic plays and comedy performances.

The Westend theatre neighborhood started to be established with the opening of numerous small theatres about 1806. The development of the Westend entertainment region gained pace with the Theatres Act 1843 that relaxed the conditions for the performance of plays. In the following decades, countless new venues were opened. That development continued until the 1st world war. For the duration of the 50s and 60s, lots of plays were created in theatre clubs in order to dodge the censorship at that time exercised by the Lord Chamberlain’s Office. However, the Theatres Act 1968 at long last abolished censorship of the stage in the UK.

Most of the theatres in the West end are of late Victorian or Edwardian construction and most are privately owned. The bulk of them have great character and the largest and best maintained include grand neo-classical, Romanesque or Victorian facades and luxurious detailed interior design and decoration. Then again, leg space is often cramped and audience amenities like bars and toilets are usually much smaller than in modern venues. The protected status of the buildings and their confined urban locations, together with financial constraints, make it awfully hard to make extensive enhancements to the furnishings, fixtures and fittings.

Some of the long running musicals performed in the West End have profitably played to audiences for many years. A few of the most well-liked musicals are We Will Rock You that is set in a future world where rock music is banned, Les Miserables which is an international award winning musical about an epic story of passion and destruction, Chicago is about a young woman who has killed her lover but is acquitted, The Lion King that is an adaptation of the Disney film, The Phantom of the Opera that tells the tale of the phantom that terrorises the Paris Opera, Billy Elliot which is the moving story of a boy who loves ballet, Dirty Dancing which is the stage version of the classic film, Sister Act is another adaptation of a hit movie, Mamma Mia is about a mother and daughter and three potential dads, and Stomp which is a fast paced combination of music, tap dance and percussion. The list is endless as there are so many West End stage productions to pick from. There really is a show that could appeal to everyone. Attending a theatre show in the Westend is truly rather special.

The Proscenium Arch



The proscenium arch is like a window to the stage! It is a window that separates the audience from the stage and it is a central element in an established form of theater design.

The theater is entertainment! Yes the theater is entertainment! The theater is about viewing the stage. In the old Victorian theaters, seating rose almost literally and symbolically to ‘the gods. This was where the highest seats were…but these seats were away from the plushness, glamor and style below. Yes the gods, they offered a view but it was one view.

You could say the proscenium arch was the window for this view. It was a ‘real and true’ window. However, maybe the real window was the great central space of the theater which rose to the lights, sometimes great chandeliers above….

Sometimes as you look through the proscenium arch, you can see the great stage below…and sometimes it is at the back of this stage that the orchestra plays.. the orchestra plays behind the stage rather than in front of the stage in the ‘pit’. And here then the stage is another world..

The proscenium arch and its curtains and all..and the lighting around.. these can create the illusion of space. You could argue that the proscenium arch restrains and hinders ‘space’. The audience is ‘cramped in’ as they wait for the rise of the curtains. But why would they be cramped in? There is space for everyone! Maybe the proscenium arch does the opposite. Instead of ‘restraining’ space, it rather creates space.

Space is important in theater..and in the victorian theaters..seating rises to the ‘gods’. It’s as if there is a lack of seating and the only way is up! But is this really the reason? Maybe the reason is to view the stage or maybe it is ..something to do with the real and true purpose of the theater, which is entertainment. Yes, entertaining not just the so-called high-brow but the low-brow also…the high brow, the low brow..and the middle brow of course. Yes, the reason is entertainment and theater, it’s just offers the human being the chance to be a spectator, any chance…and ‘the gods’ and the ‘circles’ can give that chance. And ‘the gods’, although they are cheap and high’ are sometimes the best places to see the entertainment.

But what does the proscenium hide? It hides the stage behind and when the curtain rises,the stage opens out into a wide space. Sometimes it’s not just a picture that the audience sees…..it is not just a picture they see but a whole world. And in this way, you can say that the proscenium arch hides and then uncovers a world rather than a stage or a picture and people want to see new worlds! So the proscenium arch is the great window which ‘offers’ this world. It is the ‘book cover’, the great outer design aiming to uncover the great inner design behind.

Celebrity Gossip – An Interview With Entertainment News Leader Colin Drummond



Colin Drummond, the former Producer of TMZ Celebrity News is a leader in the entertainment industry with extensive experience in film production, prominent business connections and a penchant and knack for capturing the everyday actions of fascinating people in the public eye. Drummond is now CEO and founder of a recently launched entertainment news agency dedicated to distributing photographs, video and humanistic news stories about politicians, and celebrities in the Washington, DC arena and worldwide.

Who makes the headlines and how does an entertainment news agency provide up-to-the-minute exclusive video and photos of headlining politicians, celebrities and public officials? Dorothy Dutch asked probing questions of Colin Drummond to get to the heart of the paparazzi phenomena. For those of us who unabashedly enjoy flipping through celebrity photo stories on line or off, it can be even more satisfying if we understand the world of the candid camera.

This interview session is aimed at the journalists who give us our daily doses of unethical behavior, celebrity photos, gossip, news articles, and entertainment news even before prime time entertainment shows enter our living rooms. Drummond’s answers offer a surprising eye view of a world behind the candid cameras of the paparazzi.

Dorothy Dutch: Are paparazzi also writers or mainly just photographers?

Colin Drummond: Most are photographers or former photographers who go on to start their own agencies. They work at a day rate (standard pay for a day). This is known as freelancing. It’s better for them because they still own their images or videos. Most paparazzi are freelance photographers who work for agencies who sell their photos and the agency takes a cut. A good agency has a strong sales team and can get photos on T.V. shows, magazines, billboards, and even inside movie marketing material.

DD: What qualifications must a paparazzo have?

CD: A pap has to have workable camera equipment, knowledge of celebrities, know how to take photos, and be able to ask great questions. For equipment they need plenty of camera gear, a fast SLR camera, a few good lens, (very costly) and a HD Video camera.

DD: Can anyone do it?

CD: Yes and No. Anyone can get lucky and capture a great picture by being in the right place at the right time, but doing it day after day requires hard work and dedication to your craft. DD: The paparazzi are perceived as “pests” to be avoided because they will do anything to get a picture. Are they that bad?

CD: Not really. Those who have been in the business for awhile have good relationships with all the celebrities. They usually know how close they can get to someone or who they need to use their long lens on.

DD: Is it true that they will literally provoke a subject into anger in order to get a more candid, unflattering shot and if not, why do you think the paparazzi are so disliked that fights break out?

CD: No. Fights are usually initiated by overzealous bodyguards or hangers on who really don’t understand the business and think they are helping the stars out. There have been times when bodyguards have even been fired for getting too aggressive

DD: What stars and famous people have you photographed who actually enjoy working with the paparazzi?

CD: Hands down, Tom Cruise, Kim Kardashian, Paris Hilton, Hugh Jackman, Larry King.

DD: Which celebrities do you know who want to avoid them?

CD: Gwenyth Paltrow, Scarlett Johanson, Cameron Diaz, Jennifer Aniston, Cher, Barbara Streisand DD: Do politicians on the Washington scene resist photographers?

CD: No, at first politicos didn’t understand the paparazzi game in DC, but now they realize they are public figures and since technology has evolved they should try to use it to their advantage.

DD: Is it different following high level political figures than it is to photograph film and television stars?

CD: Yes, they often look at you as if to ask, “Why are you taking my photo on the streets? I’m no celebrity.” But these days all politicians know they have to be visual to appeal to the younger market and to represent their districts. Some are even flattered that their constituents are seeing them in magazines.

DD: If an agency covers a geographic area like Washington, DC, do the paparazzi follow the celebs and politicians as they leave town or go out of the country?

CD: Not necessarily, but if a politician has a great (hot) story, you can bet that he or she will be tailed. The freelance photographer will pay for his or her own transportation, but if working with an agency, the agency will pay airfare, food and lodging.

DD: Are paparazzi invited to any major events or do they just have to wait around outside until all the celebrities enter or emerge?

CD: Some moonlight and shoot red carpet events, but the real hard core photographers don’t like these functions because they are controlled situations and the photos aren’t worth as much as candid street photos.

DD: I have also heard that they do not care about the laws restricting photographs of celebs to public places. They are willing to pay the fines in order to get great shots. Is this generally the case?

CD: This is not usually true because most know that magazines will not buy photos of celebrities in restricted areas. Agencies also prefer to keep their names in good graces with the celebrities and their public relations people, so agencies will not jeopardize that standing.

DD: Can you tell me about a personal experience you have had with a celeb that you will never forget?

Once I was working on Paul McCartney during his huge divorce scandal. As five other paparazzi where waiting outside his house in NYC Paul just walked out and none of the other five saw him leave. I followed him for about a block and then he stopped and posed for me, thinking those where the photos I wanted. I let him walk through Manhattan without photographing him and he went to have dinner. I just waited outside, and then when he came back outside, he said he had given me the photos so why was I still following him. I said, “Sir Paul, I am not taking anymore photos of you out of respect, but I am working on an assignment for a newspaper in London and they want to know everything you do today”. He started laughing and asked me what newspaper it was, and I told him it was The Daily Mail and he laughed again.

DD: Is there competition from the general public (with all the digital cameras) who are submitting great shots to various publications?

CD: Of course, but the difference is, the general public does not consistently know when or have the patience to take the really great shot. Sometimes you have to let the celebrity do something which the public is waiting to see. For example, a new couple who is rumored to be dating but they keep denying it and the general public sees them in the streets out an about. But, the best photo of them would be taken if the photographer knows to wait until they hold hands, or even kiss. Big Money Shot!

DD: Do you have a staff of writers to incorporate the news with the celebrity photos?

CD: Yes we have a few writers, and try to team up our writers within their strengths. One might love music and will write on all the musical artists. Another might love female fashions and would get that story, but most of all everyone is celebrity and political news clued.

1 2 3 4 5 ... 11 12